News

The latest on everything that matters to student life, from UCD’s campuses and from around the country

Otwo

The University Observer’s award-winning arts and culture supplement features the best in new music, film and fashion

Features

Peek behind the scenes of student life and gain a deeper insight into the matters shaping academic life

Science & Health

Thoughts, debate and commentary on the latest breakthroughs and discoveries about the wider world

Sport

Catch up with the latest UCD sports news and read opinion, debate and analysis on all things athletic

Home » News Analysis

Analysis: Holding up progress

Contributed by Bridget Fitzsimons on Tuesday, 24 November 2009One Comment

With tensions running high in UCD Students’ Union after Kimberley Foy’s resignation and allegations made against Paddy Ryan, Bridget Fitzsimons asks why the SU is not attempting better relations

It has been difficult to ignore the recent fractions within the Students’ Union. The Union’s Postgraduate Officer, Kimberley Foy, has felt the need to step down from her role, after a motion of no confidence in her was raised by her SU sabbatical colleagues at Union Council.

Issues arose when Foy failed to seek election to the postgraduate seat on Governing Authority, as she is mandated to do by the SU constitution. However, citing a heavy workload between her academic programme, her UCDSU position and her job as Environmental Officer with the Union of Students in Ireland, Foy maintains that she had asked the SU Campaigns & Communications Officer, Paddy Ryan, to keep her informed on the matter, a matter Ryan concedes he may have forgotten.

PaddyRyanQuestions have also been asked of Ryan’s ability to carry out his duties. In advance of a recent protest at Wicklow County Council, class reps reported only being made aware of the event, and being asked to attend, late the previous evening. It has also been reported, though since denied, that Executive Officers have met to discuss asking Ryan for his resignation. With this level of infighting and problems within the SU, shouldn’t students ask for a better and more cohesive service?

UCDSU has seen great progress this year, with more class reps than ever and the defeat for now of third-level fees. However it seems as if, at ground level, basic student needs are not being met, especially from a campaigning point of view. Surely for a protest to be successful, the vast majority of class reps must attend, as well as encouraging other students to accompany them.

When a Campaigns & Communications Officer decides that sixteen hours’ notice is enough for a student to drop everything and attend a protest that has been planned for days, something is very wrong. Students must question whether those they elected are, in fact, doing the jobs they are mandated to do. When organisation of protests is so obviously haphazard and sloppy so far into the sabbatical officers’ terms, something has to change, either in work performance or in the people filling the roles.

Similarly, it seems as if communication has broken down within the SU itself. Foy’s case only serves to highlight this. Her work within the SU, her role in USI, and her postgraduate programme undoubtedly made for a busy schedule, and it cannot be said that she was wrong in asking Ryan, whose position is his full-time job, to help her. Foy expressed shock at the fact that no one had spoken to her prior to the motion and it is not hard to see why. In a mature and official society, officers and colleagues speak to one another and raise problems and issues in a calm manner.

It is not too much for students to expect their representatives to work with each other in a professional manner, so as to ensure the SU provides the best representation and service for its members. Communication and help must be available to all officers within the SU, especially from the sabbatical officers whose job it is to serve students, and to further the Union and its causes.

Witch-hunting and bullying cannot be condoned, but if an officer is not doing their job, it is in the best interest of the students for them to be removed. Students must be vigilant to make sure that their SU does not allow inept people to remain in office simply due to camaraderie on the Union corridor. The Students’ Union is not, and should not be, somewhere for overgrown students to wait out their UCD tenure and avoid graduation. It is a place where students can go for representation and help; for people who want to affect change.

It is our Union; we pay the wages of these sabbatical officers, and we are completely within our rights to stand up and demand a high standard of support and representation. We cannot allow infighting and petty politics to stand in the way of the work a students’ union is supposed to do.

One Comment »

  • Jennifer Lyons said:

    Re: Paddy Ryan Article – On a fast track to nowhere.

    Madam,

    I was disappointed to read another article in the previous issue of The University Observer attacking our Campaigns and Communications Officer Paddy Ryan. I was even more disappointed to see the author contradict herself on numerous occasions in order to criticise the officer unfairly.

    I would like to address three points made by the author specifically. The author talks about the two great successes of the Students’ Union this year “UCDSU has seen great progress this year, with more class reps than ever and the defeat for now of third-level fees”. Both of these issues are the main objectives of the Campaigns and Communications portfolio- like him or not surely he should be applauded and praised for these two successes alone.

    The resignation of the Postgraduate Officer is also blamed on Paddy Ryan in this article- as it was in the previous edition of The University Observer. The author blames Paddy Ryan for failing to notify the Postgraduate Officer about elections and committees. This is not the brief of the Campaigns and Communications Officer however as he doesn’t even sit on these committees. Both the President and Education Officer sit on various committees with the Postgraduate Officer; they should be the ones informing her of those committees and the elections to them.

    Lastly I would like to mention the protest which the author condemns Paddy Ryan for his lack of communication on. Protests and especially sit-in protests like the protest in question are often kept secret until last minute for a reason. A sit-in protest will simply not work if it becomes public knowledge too early. Perhaps this is why “class reps reported only being made aware of the event, and being asked to attend, late the previous evening”. A sit-in would not have worked otherwise and the protest ended up getting good media coverage

    Let us not forget that Paddy Ryan has the highest mandate of any of the current officers with 51% of the vote and from what I have seen he is clearly the most liked. The incompetence of other officers cannot and should not be blamed on him. I am not a class rep but I was many years ago during my initial degree. I do read your articles however and to be honest they shock me. As the author says “Witch-hunting and bullying cannot be condoned”. This article is a clear example of this type of bullying; journalistic bullying based on the opinions of few- not those of the greater student body.

    Yours etc,

    Jennifer Lyons BA
    Mature Student